The Boston Planning Department (BPD) has extended the public comment period for an unpopular new Downtown zoning initiative after receiving over 500 letters of opposition from residents.
The previous comment period for the project, called PLAN: Downtown, was slated to end on February 5, just three weeks after it was proposed to the public. It has now been extended to March 7.
The BPD did not make an announcement about the change, but posted the update to its website on February 5 and added a link to a survey for residents to share their concerns.
The department has also had several meetings with the mayor’s office, other city department heads, and a group of Downtown community leaders to address the overwhelming response to PLAN: Downtown and find a way to move forward.
“There’s
motivation on the city’s end and on our end to try to get to a
resolution quickly,” said Rishi Shukla, the head of the Downtown Boston
Neighborhood Association, who participated in the meetings. “What that
is going to look like. That’s still a TBD. This was really just, ‘Let’s
agree that we need more time and process to get this right.’”
PLAN:
Downtown has been in the works since 2018, and its latest draft was
announced last month. Under the draft, a new zoning district would limit
buildings to a height of 155 feet, unless over 60 percent of building
use was residential, in which case the maximum height would be 500 feet.
In January, over 230 people attended a Zoom call hosted by the BPD
about the draft to voice their concerns.
Many
attendees warned that the city’s supposed emphasis on creating housing
would instead lead to a canyon of luxury high rises unaffordable to most
residents. More were concerned that the city had only given them three
weeks to respond.
Mayor
Michelle Wu attended the first BPD meeting with community leaders last
week, and one participant said it was her suggestion to extend the
comment period.
“That
was the first thing that she addressed,” said Josh Leffler, the chair of
the Beacon Hill Civic Association, who attended the meeting. “That’s
obviously different than prior messaging. But the mayor, from the very
beginning of that meeting, fully acknowledged that that had to be part
of the plan going forward. She took it off the table, in terms of things
that we needed to spend our time on.”
In
January, the BPD had been unwilling to extend the comment period.
Shukla said that Kairos Shen, the Chief of Planning for the city, had
since also become more receptive to feedback.
“He’s
got to lead the way here,” Shukla said. “But I think what’s different
this time around, compared to the [public] January meeting, is you’ve
got other department heads who are involved, that represent housing and
preservation. It’s good to have those voices at the table along with
Kairos. He’s expressed an interest in trying to figure out how we get to
a resolution. That’s a positive development from my perspective.”
Shukla
and Leffler both said the city would continue to have a standing
meeting with community stakeholders, including their neighborhood
associations and local preservation groups, over the next four to five
weeks. Shukla said it was possible that the city would again extend the
public comment period.
“There are no guarantees,” Shukla said.
“The
good news is that there’s motivation on the city’s part to try to
figure out how to get this right, and I’ll take them at their word.”